Post category – Mammals > Carnivores

corsac fox (alt text)

Corsac fox I Vulpes corsac

The Corsac fox hails from central and northeast asia — places such as Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Siberia and parts of China. It’s described as ‘medium-sized’, although it’s much smaller than our resident red fox, the largest of the true foxes.

The group at Hamerton breeds quite successfully, and I believe Hamerton supplies most of the Corsac foxes seen at other collections in the UK.

This was my first ever visit to Hamerton, which is an excellent collection not far from the A1/A14 intersection in Huntingdonshire. I’d spent the entire day there, and now it was late afternoon, most of the visitors had left and I was one of only a few remaining. It was a lovely sunny late August Sunday, and I’d taken several hundred shots around the various enclosures.

The foxes, which all share a large enclosure containing several ‘huts’, had only been seen in ones and twos throughout most of the day; however, now there were many more visible, including several which were obvious youngsters, probably born earlier that year.

While most of the foxes paid little attention to anyone other than the keepers, this particular individual emerged from the long summer grass, headed straight towards me, and sat down right next to the fence, staring intently at me.

The enclosure has a high fence, with a diagonal mesh, to contain the animals. Outside of this, there is a grass gap of around 1m (3 ft) and then a low fence to deter visitors from getting too close.

My usual camera setup involves a right angle finder attachment, clipped to the viewfinder, which allows me to get the camera down to a low level without having to lay on the ground to do so. It certainly saves my aching back! I’m then looking down into the camera, which is still shooting horizontally.

So, at a place like Hamerton, I can kneel or crouch on the path next to the low fence, and the camera is then just a few inches above the ground, pointing at the subject, through both fences. In this case, it was eye-level with the young fox, which was clearly very interested in what I was up (down) to.

As he was so close to the main mesh, I needed to get the lens as near as I could (within reason) to the main fence in order to stand any chance of throwing it far enough out of focus so as not to be troublesome in the final image. I aligned it with an appropriate gap in the mesh of the low fence — one which also allowed me to see both eyes unobstructed by the wire of the main fence. I set a wide aperture and hoped for the best.

I would estimate the fox was only around 1.5m away, but not at all perturbed by my shuffling around to get into position. He/she stayed there for half a minute or so — yawning halfway through that period — before losing interest and wandering back into the long grass.

image edit

The final image, with it’s warm contre-jour lighting, lovely background grasses, and intense expression on the face of the fox, needed very little post-processing.

Corsac fox I (prior to edit)

I left the framing pretty much as shot. Yes, the diagonal chequer pattern of the main fence is visible, but I don’t feel it detracts from the subject. I later tried a square format crop, which also works well.

Technical

f/4.5

aperture


1/640s

shutter


320

iso


189mm

focal length


corsac fox (alt text)

Alt text for Amur tiger I

Amur tiger I Panthera tigris altaica

I’d never really had much luck photographing the tigers at Whipsnade. I have a whole heap of very average pictures of them, taken over the past five years or so. I think it’s partly to do with that fact that I’d usually visited at fairly busy times, and ‘sharing’ the experience with several tens or even hundreds of other people means that it’s difficult to catch that moment where you have direct eye contact. This time, however, was different…

I’d been at the Zoo for several hours, on a cold, foggy day last November. It was mid-afternoon, normally a busy time on any reasonably nice day, but on this occasion the poor weather meant that I was almost the only person at Tiger Falls, the fantastic Whipsnade exhibit housing a pair of Amur, or Siberian, tigers.

Anastasia, the female, was resting on the uppermost platform at the lower end of the exhibit, from where she was keeping a close eye on the much younger male, Botzman, as he patrolled the enclosure below.

I headed for the two large, glass viewing windows on the lower path which skirts the south side of the exhibit, right next to the pond at the foot of the aforementioned ‘falls’. I’d had the occasional ‘ok’ shot from here on previous visits, as one or other of the tigers made their way downhill from their housing/den area, providing a brief face-on view. Although, to be honest, I needed a longer lens for that particular shot: my 70-200mm handles most subjects pretty well in a typical zoo situation, but there are definitely occasions when the extra reach of something like a 400mm would be very welcome.

However, I persevered and tracked Botzman around the enclosure, waiting for an opportune moment. Nothing much was happening though: the couple on the far side of the enclosure had wandered off, so now it was just Botzman and me, with Ana having settled down for a snooze on her lofty lookout post. As the big male headed across to the far side of the exhibit, I thought it would be a good opportunity to grab a makeshift lenshood from my camera backpack, which I’d earlier placed on the ground by my feet. The lenshood, made from a rectangle of thin black foam sheeting picked up from a craft shop, and held onto the lens with a piece of garden wire, serves to minimise the effect of reflections when shooting through glass. It’s a lot more flexible than the standard hood supplied with the lens, and can be moulded to a suitable shape to combat reflections at almost any angle.

So, I’m crouched down next to my camera bag, fishing around for said piece of foam and length of garden wire; whilst all the time keeping half an eye on the enclosure. I reckoned I’d got plenty of time before Botzman came closer again. However, I hadn’t anticipated what happened next: Botzman looked up from his casual explorations and suddenly caught sight of me.

I was still crouched down, most of my body obscured beneath the lower edge of the window, and with a hat on as it was pretty cold. So I’m guessing that, from his perspective, I probably looked potentially snack-sized and worthy of immediate investigation. Maybe I look like a chicken? Who knows. Anyway, suddenly I became the most interesting thing in his world, and he started heading directly across the enclosure towards me: not quite running, but at a brisk, purposeful walking pace, eyes fixed in my direction.

Eye contact with the big cats always manages to take my breath away. I’d only experienced it for fleeting moments with the Whipsnade tigers previously; this time, however, I had Botzman’s full and undivided attention for what seemed like ages.

It took me a second or so to fully register what was happening, and then some sort of photographic instinct kicked in; I dropped the lenshood, and quickly raised the camera into position. I was still crouched down at this point, but this was perfect as the camera was then at tiger eye-level as he got nearer. Also, had I stood up, I guess my (unintentional) ruse would’ve been discovered, and he’d have lost interest immediately.

It had been foggy all morning, and thickly overcast all afternoon. So the light levels generally were pretty low, and things locally were even worse, as I was effectively crouched down in a north-facing hollow in a lightly wooded area of the Zoo. But even so, the Canon 5D Mark III autofocus snapped onto Botzman’s face almost instantly, and tracked focus as he carried on approaching. I fired off just four shots as he headed directly towards me. For some reason, I still haven’t got into the habit of holding my finger down on the shutter button and letting the camera ‘machine-gun’ 20 or so shots by itself  — I guess it’s something to do with my previous cameras having a fairly pedestrian continuous frame rate, which in turn meant a high likelihood of missing that ‘decisive moment’. The 5D3 is much better in this regard, and it’s something I need to experiment with.

With the light being so poor, I’d set a high ISO of 3200 as I’d approached the exhibit earlier, together with a wide aperture of f/5 which I figured would keep shutter speeds fast enough for successful handheld shots at 200mm. ISO 3200 is as high as I would generally go on the 5D3, although I have had usable shots all the way up to the 25,600 setting on occasion.

image edit

Back on the computer, I chose this particular shot of the four — I liked the position of the leading foreleg, the fact that the tail can be seen, and of course the amazing eye-contact.

Amur tiger I (prior to edit)

I’m still undecided though, on the best way to process the photo. I’ve tried several options including portrait, landscape and square crops, leaving the background trees and bushes more visible, or darkening them. For this version, I’ve gone for a more heavily-processed look, which starts with a 50% cropped landscape format, with the subject positioned quite far to the left of centre, ‘walking into’ the space on the right. I’ve applied a heavy dose of contrast and quite a bit of Vibrance in Lightroom, and then taken the cropped and part-edited shot into Viveza, one of the Google Nik Collection plugins, which allowed me to selectively adjust the brightness, hue, saturation of the background versus the main subject. I chose to darken the background right down, which simultaneously created the effect of a pool of light just behind the tiger.

Cloning of distractions was minimal: just a couple of bits of brightly-lit twiggery in the bushes behind the tiger, and similarly a blade of grass or two from the foreground.

I realise that parts of the tiger are now seriously overexposed, and I may yet have another go at it, but, for the moment, I’m reasonably happy with this version.

Technical

f/5

aperture


1/500s

shutter


3200

iso


191mm

focal length


Alt text for Amur tiger I

Cheetah I Acinonyx jubatus

I really like visiting zoos in bad weather. Well, maybe not bad weather exactly — I hate trying to take photos on a windy, rainy day — but at least weather which provides the opportunity to photograph the animals in situations different from the norm. Snow is always good for this, being unusual enough in most parts of the UK to provide interest. And fog — as here — is another.

An added bonus is that the ‘interesting’ weather generally puts off a lot of people from visiting zoos. Not that I hate people, you understand, but it does allow a little more flexibility, enabling me to move the camera quickly to the optimum position between shots without obstructing fellow visitors.

On this particular late November day in 2014, the fog had been quite thick when I arrived, and I’d already stopped by the rhino and sitatunga paddocks and captured some ethereal, almost abstract shots of their shapes on the horizon. It was a little less misty when I arrived at the cheetah enclosure, and a couple of animals were out near the viewing area next to the main perimeter road. One was lying on the grass, and with careful positioning I was able to get what I thought were some nice shots from low down, with direct eye contact. However, looking at them later on the computer, I realised that the camera angle had foreshortened the cheetah’s front legs to the point where they looked somewhat odd.

The second individual was wandering around, and suddenly hopped up onto a tree bough which had been inserted into the ground in the enclosure.

From this position, there’s no option but to shoot through a wire fence, and, with the fence in question being around 2m away, I set the aperture to the maximum available — f/4 — on my 70-200mm zoom, in the hope that any wire strands would be thrown so far out of focus so as to be invisible (or, at least, non-distracting). ISO 640 gave a high shutter speed to deal with any subject or camera movement. I was leaning over one low fence to get the camera as close as possible to the main fence, although it was still a good few feet away.

I held the camera as low as possible (I use a right-angle viewfinder attachment for this, as my camera — a Canon 5D Mark II in this instance — doesn’t have a flip-out rear screen facility). This meant that I could position the whole of the cheetah against the grey sky and out-of-focus hedge in the background, and not have it half-and-half aginst the grass and the hedge

I shot a couple of frames while it scanned around, and then another two as it looked towards the ground and the jumped down to rejoin its companion.

image edit

Two of the four shots looked ok: one where the cheetah was looking downwards, and this one where it is looking out of the enclosure towards the zebra paddock. This is probably my favourite, as it shows the eyes quite well.

Cheetah I (prior to edit)

The tree/branch was proving quite troublesome to deal with effectively, but in the end I settled on an agreeable composition. I wanted the cheetah to be looking into the frame — this meant dealing with the upright boughs on the left. I’ve settled on a crop where the uppermost branch of the ‘V’ in the bough intersects the corner of the frame. I also moved the crop inwards on both sides, so that none of the branch ends were visible, and excluded the lower branch, and the small tree jutting into the top right of frame, completely.  All of that meant that I ended up with a roughly 50% crop, but to me, it just looks more ‘correct’ than any of the other options I tried. The heavier branches on the left, I feel, balance the cheetah and branch on the right. My Photoshop skills are not up to removing the central branch though!

I’ve increased the saturation and contrast of the various elements, the foreground more so than the background, in order to increase subject separation from the defocussed grass and hedge. I’ve also increased the shadow detail of the foreground branches, as I quite like the lichen and bark details. The tree in the right midground is still a little distracting, but I think it’s just about far enough out of focus and fog-enshrouded to not cause too many issues.

Technical

f/4

aperture


1/2000s

shutter


640

iso


160mm

focal length


canada lynx alt text

Canada lynx I Lynx canadensis

I had a few hours to spare. I didn’t need to be on the east coast until late afternoon, visiting friends for a New Year get-together. Hamerton wasn’t too far off my proposed route to the coast, so I grabbed my camera bag and set off for Huntingdonshire.

Hamerton Zoological Park is quite a recent discovery for me, but it has quickly become one of my favourite places to visit. Although quite small, it has a range of unusual animals, and I’m lucky in that it’s only about an hour or so’s drive from my home.

One of the more recent additions to the collection are the pair of Canada lynx.  These were, I understand, brought over from a private collection in the USA around a year ago. The female ‘Tanzi’ has been kept offshow since her arrival, but the male ‘Timmy’ can be viewed in a prominent position very near to the entrance to the Park (in the Binturong House). This is a temporary situation: work is almost complete on a spacious new enclosure which will house both animals in due course. Hamerton is, I believe, the only UK collection currently holding this species, and one of only half-a-dozen or so in the whole of Europe.

I arrived just after opening time on a gloriously sunny New Years Eve morning. I couldn’t see Timmy in his outside enclosure, so popped my head inside the Binturong House and saw him sitting on a fake rock in the window, basking in the low winter sunshine streaming through the glazed doors. I took a quick wide shot of the entire scene from the doorway, and then carefully retreated in the hope of not disturbing him. After adjusting my camera settings, I then re-entered the house very slowly and was pleased to see that he obviously wasn’t planning on moving out of his suntrap any time soon. I was then able to take several closeup shots of him as he continued to enjoy the sun.

Out of the eight shots I took, this was probably my favourite. Although I somehow missed getting both ear tufts in shot, I still like it for the slightly quizzical expression on his tilted face, and the hint of a warm defocussed background in the lower third of the shot (the interior of the house is lined with what appears to be wood-effect panelling).

I’d chosen an aperture of f/5.6 for this particular shot, on my 70-200mm zoom set at a typical portrait focal length of around 90mm. The lynx head is roughly the same overall size as a human head, so these portrait settings can apply equally well to both types of ‘sitter’. I could’ve lowered the ISO below my chosen setting of 400, but on the Canon EOS 5D Mark III there is little noticeable difference between the lower ISOs, at least for ‘normal’ size enlargements. ISO 400 allowed me to retain a highish shutter speed of 1/500s, which meant I could handhold the camera quite easily without camera shake becoming a major factor, even if I decided to zoom in to 200mm for a detail shot.

image edit

Here is the original shot:

Canada lynx I (prior to edit)

Post-processing on this one was quite straightforward — lifting the shadows/midtones whilst deepening the darker tones. Also bringing back some detail in the whites by use of the Highlights slider in Lightroom. Adding a little Vibrance and that was it. The crop was exactly as seen in camera, with the head positioned slightly off-centre, tilting into the space on the left of shot.

Technical

f/5.6

aperture


1/500s

shutter


400

iso


93mm

focal length


canada lynx alt text